You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Use member classes for service and action child interfaces #83
In short, I think it is more intuitive for users to reference Request, Response, Goal, Feedback, and Result interfaces as members of the top-level interface instead of having them as siblings of the top-level interface.
For example,
examples_interfaces.srv.AddTwoInts.Request
versus how they are currently referenced
examples_interfaces.srv.AddTwoInts_Request
Accessing these classes as members is also similar to how it's done in C++ and Python.
@jacobperron makes total sense. I tried getting that working, but I've forgotten why I couldn't. In any case, it'd be great to use .Request / .Response instead.
Activity
esteve commentedon Mar 18, 2020
@jacobperron makes total sense. I tried getting that working, but I've forgotten why I couldn't. In any case, it'd be great to use
.Request/.Responseinstead.Add example_interfaces to desktop repos file (#83)