Skip to content

Need to resync Fast-RTPS C++11 #4

Closed

Description

@Theosakamg

For subproject : ros2_java_android.repos
On https://github.com/esteve/Fast-RTPS branch cpp11-android (sorry, no issues available)

When you build :

Process package 'rmw_fastrtps_cpp' with context:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 source_space => ..../src/eProsima/ROS-RMW-Fast-RTPS-cpp/rmw_fastrtps_cpp
  build_space => ..../build_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp
install_space => ..../install_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp
   make_flags => -j4, -l4
  build_tests => False
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+++ Building 'rmw_fastrtps_cpp'
==> '..../build_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp/cmake__build.sh && /usr/bin/make cmake_check_build_system' in '..../build_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp'
==> '..../build_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp/cmake__build.sh && /usr/bin/make -j4 -l4' in '..../build_isolated/rmw_fastrtps_cpp'
[ 50%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/src/functions.cpp.o
..../src/eProsima/ROS-RMW-Fast-RTPS-cpp/rmw_fastrtps_cpp/src/functions.cpp:2516:46: error: no member named 'getAttributes' in 'eprosima::fastrtps::Publisher'
            client_info->request_publisher_->getAttributes().topic.getTopicName().c_str(),
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ^
1 error generated.
CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/build.make:62: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/src/functions.cpp.o' failed
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/src/functions.cpp.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:99: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rmw_fastrtps_cpp.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:127: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

Activity

  1. Theosakamg commented on Oct 3, 2016

    @Theosakamg
    Author
  2. esteve commented on Oct 4, 2016

    @esteve
    Member

    This repository is only for the ROS2 Java bindings.

    Please comment on the PR you linked so the upstream developers know that there are people using that branch and that it'd be beneficial to have it merged. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions