You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Alpine: possibly wrong information is indexed #915
@armijnhemel Thank you ++
That's a beautiful finding!
We are getting the data from the Alpine secdb https://secdb.alpinelinux.org/ and this is likely wrong there too. So we can fix this indeed with some correlation and cross-checking (and then contribute it back upstream to Alpine)
@armijnhemel Thank you ++ That's a beautiful finding! We are getting the data from the Alpine secdb https://secdb.alpinelinux.org/ and this is likely wrong there too. So we can fix this indeed with some correlation and cross-checking (and then contribute it back upstream to Alpine)
But it is the wrong version. This version of Ninja2 never existed. The Alpine maintainer made a typo in the package version, as can be clearly seen in the packaging information. Why not fix it?
@armijnhemel Thank you ++ That's a beautiful finding! We are getting the data from the Alpine secdb https://secdb.alpinelinux.org/ and this is likely wrong there too. So we can fix this indeed with some correlation and cross-checking (and then contribute it back upstream to Alpine)
I am wondering how many other errors there are in the Alpine security database. What I could imagine is that you would check the Alpine recipes to see if a certain version exists or ever existed. I could even imagine also checking the upstream sources to see if a package version actually has ever existed.
Activity
[-]Alpine: wrong information is indexed[/-][+]Alpine: possibly wrong information is indexed[/+]pombredanne commentedon Sep 12, 2022
@armijnhemel Thank you ++
That's a beautiful finding!
We are getting the data from the Alpine secdb https://secdb.alpinelinux.org/ and this is likely wrong there too. So we can fix this indeed with some correlation and cross-checking (and then contribute it back upstream to Alpine)
armijnhemel commentedon Sep 12, 2022
Just verified, it is wrong in their secdb
TG1999 commentedon Sep 12, 2022
@pombredanne @armijnhemel if we check this reference https://cve.report/qid/501765 they also have stated
Affected Package versions prior to 1.11.3-r0armijnhemel commentedon Sep 12, 2022
But it is the wrong version. This version of Ninja2 never existed. The Alpine maintainer made a typo in the package version, as can be clearly seen in the packaging information. Why not fix it?
TG1999 commentedon Sep 12, 2022
@armijnhemel makes sense!
armijnhemel commentedon Sep 13, 2022
I am wondering how many other errors there are in the Alpine security database. What I could imagine is that you would check the Alpine recipes to see if a certain version exists or ever existed. I could even imagine also checking the upstream sources to see if a package version actually has ever existed.
armijnhemel commentedon Sep 15, 2022
#917 is a generalization of this bug